14-04-2025, 03:53 PM
In previous posts I have argued why the imagery gives rise to the belief that the script is a set of astronomical symbols organized in some way. I actually think the book forms a well-knit unit and conveys an idea consistent with the medieval mentality.
Now I want to focus only on the script and what we can deduce from its nature. I'll give an example. There are a dozen pieces of glyphs containing the following sequence [cccc]. I know that people who think that the script translates a language, whether natural or encrypted, do real mental pirouettes to justify that.
What I'm defending is quite simple, as strange as it may seem. There aren't four c's, nor three or two, but just one [c] that's moving. It's the symbol of the moon moving in its orbit.
Now I want to focus only on the script and what we can deduce from its nature. I'll give an example. There are a dozen pieces of glyphs containing the following sequence [cccc]. I know that people who think that the script translates a language, whether natural or encrypted, do real mental pirouettes to justify that.
What I'm defending is quite simple, as strange as it may seem. There aren't four c's, nor three or two, but just one [c] that's moving. It's the symbol of the moon moving in its orbit.

