24-02-2025, 12:31 PM
Everyone on this forum knows that I maintain that there is nothing to read in the Voynich, which does not mean that there is nothing to interpret. I believe that the script is an astronomical-astrological notation, but I do not know how the symbols are combined and why they do it that way.
What I have always maintained is that it is necessary to correctly interpret the images to clearly see the nature of the script, and the most important thing of all the images is to interpret what those female figures are. To me there is no doubt that they are a representation of the fixed stars in the sky, but there has been no way to confirm or refute this. Academia, by which I mean people who know medieval iconography and art history, don't seem to be interested in the Voynich.
What I have always maintained is that it is necessary to correctly interpret the images to clearly see the nature of the script, and the most important thing of all the images is to interpret what those female figures are. To me there is no doubt that they are a representation of the fixed stars in the sky, but there has been no way to confirm or refute this. Academia, by which I mean people who know medieval iconography and art history, don't seem to be interested in the Voynich.