No text, but a visual code

[Antonio García Jiménez]

The f70r1 series of o's allows some insights into the nature of the script. The most obvious: the importance of this glyph [o], the most common of all, as the backbone of the script. In reality, [o] is the most ubiquitous glyph and even I believe that the spaces between glyph strings (the so-called words) are o's that have been suppressed.

This hypothesis would explain why the vast majority of labels begin with the glyph [o], as if the authors wanted to underline the fact that these labels belong to a script that is an uninterrupted chain.

It would also explain the LAAFU effect, the fact that the script responds to the continent of the page and there are privileged glyphs at the beginning and end of the lines of the so-called text. The authors conceive the succession of glyphs as a circular chain, with a beginning and an end, as in circular diagrams.

I don't think it's necessary to share my theory that the script is an astronomical-astrological notation to agree that the f70r1 with the series of o's is a great source of inspiration.