27-10-2024, 08:03 PM
It will be very difficult to find definitive proof about the nature of Voynich, but there will always be approximations or hypotheses that are more probable than others. Regarding the nature of the script, I think that sooner or later the debate will turn to whether the glyphs are semantic units, if each of them has meaning in itself, be it the one I propose or any other.
Those who designed the script did so in such a way that certain glyphs appear to correspond to each other. There is polarity and similarity. And this is something that needs to be studied.
For example, in the script we see the way the number 4 was written in the Middle Ages, and we also see the number 8 as we still write it. One is double the other. I don't think this is coincidental. I don't think the authors gave those glyphs this shape to mean anything else. Really, what they wanted to write and wrote is a 4 and an 8.
Those who designed the script did so in such a way that certain glyphs appear to correspond to each other. There is polarity and similarity. And this is something that needs to be studied.
For example, in the script we see the way the number 4 was written in the Middle Ages, and we also see the number 8 as we still write it. One is double the other. I don't think this is coincidental. I don't think the authors gave those glyphs this shape to mean anything else. Really, what they wanted to write and wrote is a 4 and an 8.

