No text, but a visual code

[Antonio García Jiménez]

There are a number of reasons to rule out that the Voynich script hides a language, whether natural or encrypted. There is a reason that I particularly like because it is visually perceived how the glyphs only serve to fill in gaps without the chain of glyphs having any phonetic meaning.

Let's look at this diagram for example (f67v1):

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

All the closed rectangles that form the two circles are filled with glyphs in such a way that they do not leave any gaps.  You might think that the authors have chosen words that fill just these spaces, but it is absurd. What happens in my opinion, as I have said before, is that glyphs are like Lego pieces. They can be put on and taken off at will.

The latter also seems absurd, but only if you think about a phonetic system. If you think of independent symbols with their own meaning, the script turns out to be like a game for the authors. They play with astronomical objects and positions. Now I put a moon, now a star nearby, now I remove it, now I put another star close to the sun, now move the moon's position and so on. The script would be nothing more than an astronomical alphabet.