03-10-2024, 07:33 PM
What I mean is that I do not have a theory of the script, but a theory of the codex in its entirety as a unit of meaning. Since I believe that iconography only reflects the influence of the stars on plants, my theory of the script is consistent with that idea, since for me it is only an astronomical notation system that the authors use as a game.
On the other hand, the fact that the script is just that and not a text is consistent with the herbs we see, most of which are the fruit of the authors' imagination. There is nothing to say about them because nothing is known about those plants, which are just a colored drawing.
To be more specific, I believe that the inclined lines of the script, up to three of them, are what we see in the so-called clock on the Rosettes page, in the loops of some gallows and in some other object of imagery
On the other hand, the fact that the script is just that and not a text is consistent with the herbs we see, most of which are the fruit of the authors' imagination. There is nothing to say about them because nothing is known about those plants, which are just a colored drawing.
To be more specific, I believe that the inclined lines of the script, up to three of them, are what we see in the so-called clock on the Rosettes page, in the loops of some gallows and in some other object of imagery

