No text, but a visual code

[Antonio García Jiménez]

I believe that any slightly complex code to interpret the script is completely anachronistic. And what we must not forget is that we are interpreting an illustrated book, not just a script. A codex that has a considerable astrological-astronomical part. That's why I think my interpretation is probable, because it is not limited to the script but also takes into account the imagery.

In my theory the imagery explains the script and vice versa. Both complement each other.