No text, but a visual code

[HermesRevived]

Hermes, that the zodiacal symbols represented on a buffalo in a Paleolithic cave has all the appearance of pseudoscience. I wouldn't pay much attention to it.
 
These symbols do not appear until the 15th century and are an ideogram of the drawings of the zodiacal signs.

You've opened an interesting matter though Antonio. My proposal is that the 'language' is some form of astrological notation, specifically Ptolemaic. But the glyph set in the Voynich bears no resemblance - not a glyph - to what became the standard astrological notation post printing press. As we've noted, the planets are just not there, and the symbols for the zodiac signs haven't arrived yet. But there's none of the symbols for, say, trines and squares and other astrological aspects - none of that. The Voynich is prior to or at least outside of the development of those symbols. There is a different design. 

If the Voynich author wanted to indicate a zodiac sign in the text, how was this accomplished? It does not seem to be the case that a Voynich word - say [qokaiin] - means "Gemini" or anything that straightforward. And there are no zodiac symbols. So how would it be done? Surely the text in the Star Catalogue makes reference to the zodiac signs? And presumably the text on the botanical pages too. And you map the fixed stars by zodiacal positions. So how, in Voynichese, does one say "10˚ Capricorn"? How does one indicate "Capricorn"?