No text, but a visual code

[Antonio García Jiménez]

I do not like to transliterate the glyphs because doing so the script loses many of its fundamental features. What we see is a glyph similar to the letter [c] that is repeated and combined to form other glyphs. Anyone can realize that the repetition of this symbol up to three times is a feature of the script: [c] [cc][ccc]. And not only that but two [cc] joined by a horizontal bar above form the benches. And another glyph that resembles the letter s also includes this feature.

All this means something. It tells us something about the author's intention when designing the script. All this is lost when transliterating the glyphs by letters of the alphabet. Information that can help solve the puzzle is lost.

I certainly have no doubt that the different forms of that glyph are nothing more than the Moon in motion.