No text, but a visual code

[Antonio García Jiménez]

Take it easy nablator, this race is long. I understand that my theory about the script seems absurd to you. It's very difficult to see. What bothers me is that someone like you who has a 5 reputation is not able to say anything regarding the explanation I have given of folio 67v2. All criticism, none support. And I don't think anyone has explained that page as I have, as anyone initiated into astrology understands it.

You are not the only one. People I appreciate intellectually also tend to respond with indifference. Nor invoking the name of a renowned art historian like Panofsky as I have done on countless occasions to explain Quire 13.

I have sometimes wondered about the usefulness of this forum. I trust above all in those people who, without being a member, enter the web daily and just want to know.