No text, but a visual code

[Hermes777]

The last time I posted this image it went unnoticed but I think it deserves a long reflection

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

What we see is that the author has not completed the outer ring. He has drawn only dots except in one part of the circle where he has written a series of o's and glyphs used in the script.

The question is: what is that series of o's, an ornament or the glyph that we also see in the script?

I provide an account of it here Antonio:

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

And also here:

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

The simplest answer to your question - if it is not a text but a visual code - is that the [o] glyph represents the sun and we start with 360 of them. 

I explain the text this way:

The foundation of the text is a continuous stream of [o] glyphs (omicrons) = solar days of the year.

oooooooo

This stream of omicrons is then punctuated with stops into an alternating sequence of stops and starts:

o|o|o|o|o|o

The stops are the solstices in the cycle of the year. The text is cosmological. It is the sun that stops and starts in an alternating sequence.

It is at this point in the development of the text that this distinction was matched to the linguistic distinction of vowels and consonants. Vowels are the omicrons (starts) and consonants are the stops.

The glyph [t] is introduced as the glyph representing the solstices, the primal consonant:

ototototot

The text, I propose, develops from this fundamental process. It is not a linguistic process. Rather, our author has used linguistic symbols (glyphs, letters) - according to their visual properties - to illustrate astronomical cycles.