It seems to me, Antonio, that your proposal has two parts:
1. The glyphs are not letters but rather visual symbols. We understand them from their shapes.
2. The glyphs are astronomical (or astrological) in nature.
The task, then, is to explain what the astronomical significance is of each of the glyph shapes. But, this should constitute a coherent system.
We could start with the [o] glyph. Conceivably, it could represent the Sun (Sol). A good place to start.
In that case, the [e] glyph - half the [o] glyph - could represent the Moon (Luna).
That is at least a plausible beginning. After all, it is a common convention in Western astrology to represent the Sun as a circle (with or without a dot in the middle), and the Moon as a half-circle (or crescent).
A glyph like [d] might then be seen as some combination of Sun and Moon, some Soli-lunar cycle?
A glyph like [y] - an [o] with a backward pointing downwards tail - might signify the "declining Sun", the winter cycle?
I am generally sympathetic to this way of looking at the glyphs, and they might well be astronomical in nature, given the context.
I explore similar things at my blog in recent posts. Especially see this post:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
My study could be seen as consistent with your point of view, or could be adapted to it by giving the process I describe astronomical correlates.
Hope this helps.
1. The glyphs are not letters but rather visual symbols. We understand them from their shapes.
2. The glyphs are astronomical (or astrological) in nature.
The task, then, is to explain what the astronomical significance is of each of the glyph shapes. But, this should constitute a coherent system.
We could start with the [o] glyph. Conceivably, it could represent the Sun (Sol). A good place to start.
In that case, the [e] glyph - half the [o] glyph - could represent the Moon (Luna).
That is at least a plausible beginning. After all, it is a common convention in Western astrology to represent the Sun as a circle (with or without a dot in the middle), and the Moon as a half-circle (or crescent).
A glyph like [d] might then be seen as some combination of Sun and Moon, some Soli-lunar cycle?
A glyph like [y] - an [o] with a backward pointing downwards tail - might signify the "declining Sun", the winter cycle?
I am generally sympathetic to this way of looking at the glyphs, and they might well be astronomical in nature, given the context.
I explore similar things at my blog in recent posts. Especially see this post:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
My study could be seen as consistent with your point of view, or could be adapted to it by giving the process I describe astronomical correlates.
Hope this helps.