No text, but a visual code

[Antonio García Jiménez]

I am going to show with some graphic examples how glyph blocks cannot be words of a language, neither natural nor encrypted.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.


In these examples, and there are more, you can see how the scribe fits the glyphs into the gaps left by stems, branches or flowers. 
The scribe makes the adjustment in such a way that the glyph block maintains the rigid structure that governs the formation of the blocks, the so-called script grammar. He removes and adds glyphs at will without being guided by a coherence of meaning in terms of language. This is what some of us know as playing Lego by putting and removing pieces.

There are those who see this strange behavior as proof that we are dealing with a hoax or something meaningless. For me it is proof that we are dealing with glyphs that, in the mind of the scribe, each one of them has its own meaning.