18-06-2023, 08:07 PM
It seems that quoting Paracelsus is somewhat achronistic. Any theory whose time frame goes beyond 1350-1450 is hardly credible.
In the Voynich there are tubes and there is what looks like water. But formulating a theory with these elements must take into account all parts of the book. For example, the green color that seems to denote water does not appear on the pages of the Rosettes, which is a representation of the universe.
Likewise, the fundamental element of iconography must be interpreted: the female figures. Are they water spirits or are they astral spirits as I believe?
In the cosmological diagrams of the VM the planets do not appear. It is further indication that the Voynich is a lapidary-like herbarium of stones that receive their magical properties solely from the stars of the zodiac.
In the Voynich there are tubes and there is what looks like water. But formulating a theory with these elements must take into account all parts of the book. For example, the green color that seems to denote water does not appear on the pages of the Rosettes, which is a representation of the universe.
Likewise, the fundamental element of iconography must be interpreted: the female figures. Are they water spirits or are they astral spirits as I believe?
In the cosmological diagrams of the VM the planets do not appear. It is further indication that the Voynich is a lapidary-like herbarium of stones that receive their magical properties solely from the stars of the zodiac.