17-06-2023, 09:51 PM
Motion seems like a good idea, but the problem is that it cannot be defined. What moves? Which motion is shown? There has to be something - if this is true.
What other alternative? So, knowing that the valid explanation of solar radiation was unrecognized back then, the most common analogous interpretation of solar processes would have been *fire*. Fire swirls and reaches outwards. The RC circles are representations of fiery disks.
As far as the VMs cosmos - it's not Andromeda. If the outer part replicates Shirakatsi, then there is some inherent motion involved in the changing phases of the moon. However, given the way it was used, in the creation of a hybridized enigma, it is difficult to believe that its actual astronomical properties were really relevant.
What other alternative? So, knowing that the valid explanation of solar radiation was unrecognized back then, the most common analogous interpretation of solar processes would have been *fire*. Fire swirls and reaches outwards. The RC circles are representations of fiery disks.
As far as the VMs cosmos - it's not Andromeda. If the outer part replicates Shirakatsi, then there is some inherent motion involved in the changing phases of the moon. However, given the way it was used, in the creation of a hybridized enigma, it is difficult to believe that its actual astronomical properties were really relevant.