No text, but a visual code

[Antonio García Jiménez]

I like to remind everyone of this from time to time: What we see in the Voynich script are glyphs that we don't know what they mean. Since the beginning of the book's research it has been customary to transliterate these glyphs and replace them with letters of the alphabet. This has facilitated the analysis but has a great disadvantage, it leads one to think that behind these glyphs there is a language, natural or encrypted.

It seems obvious but I think it is of great importance. If when we write about the script we get used to leaving the letters and reproducing the glyphs exactly as they are drawn in the book, we will have taken a great step to free ourselves from the trap of language.

That behind the groupings of glyphs there are words from a language is just a presumption and nothing more than a presumption.