No text, but a visual code

[Antonio García Jiménez]

There can be as many iconographic interpretations as researchers, but there must be an interpretation that suits the intention of the authors of the VM. For example, the bathing Muses of Christine de Pizan have nothing to do with the Voynich. Why? Because there is no relation to the other parts of the book.

I believe that any iconographic theory that is defended must respond to the premise of giving meaning to all the parts of the book. That all the VM, images and script, have a unit of meaning is for me a previous assumption. If I didn't think so, I wouldn't spend time trying to decipher it.