No text, but a visual code

[Antonio García Jiménez]

Hello Ruby, you were asking me if the glyphs can be decoded. Of course it is, it is a system with meaning for those who made the book.

The main symbols that represent the stars are EVA-o, EVA-a and EVA-y. When they are transliterated into letters, something fundamental is lost, that they all have the same round shape. The second and the third with a small tail and a larger one. They are not related only by their form but are also complementary in the structure of the script. Where one is, the other is not.

These symbols, which are the main ones because they place the stars in the sky, around the ecliptic line, are interspersed with the others, which represent either positions or other celestial objects such as the moon: EVA-e. Another symbol that when transliterated loses its crescent shape.

In general, the structure of symbols keeps some rules but it is flexible, which is why there seems to be more than one language: Currier A and B. Each scribe that intervenes applies the same mechanism: each one forms groups of symbols with a disk system overlapping, but with certain variants