18-01-2021, 05:20 PM
The following symbols: q f p m y are demonstrably not to be identified with letters.
That's five out of (say) 25. How confident can one be that the others are?
And even if they are, what to make of a mixture of letters and non-letters?
This is what ReneZ wrote some time ago. I quote him here as an authority because, in any aspect of life, anyone who studies something for years and years deserves special attention.
I understand that there are those who do not share my theory. I can be wrong, of course. But what I try to convey is that men can and have always been able to convey a meaningful message without using a language
That's five out of (say) 25. How confident can one be that the others are?
And even if they are, what to make of a mixture of letters and non-letters?
This is what ReneZ wrote some time ago. I quote him here as an authority because, in any aspect of life, anyone who studies something for years and years deserves special attention.
I understand that there are those who do not share my theory. I can be wrong, of course. But what I try to convey is that men can and have always been able to convey a meaningful message without using a language