20-12-2020, 11:05 AM
Regarding this topic of the Eva-i followed by Eva-n that we see in medieval astronomical tables and its similarity with what we see in the VM script, ReneZ has posed an interesting question: What about Eva-ir or Eva-iir?
I simply think that the authors of the VM mark different arc lengths in the sphere to locate celestial objects. Of course those who think there is an underlying language will think otherwise.
Let's apply common sense, which also had the men of the fifteenth century: Why would they create such a repetitive and confusing alphabet?
I think that the glyph system is relatively easy to understand if you consider that what is about is to reproduce celestial movements. Is that what explains that we see so many repeated words.
The hardest thing to understand is the underlying mentality, which I believe is related to the very old and persistent idea of sacred alphabets
I simply think that the authors of the VM mark different arc lengths in the sphere to locate celestial objects. Of course those who think there is an underlying language will think otherwise.
Let's apply common sense, which also had the men of the fifteenth century: Why would they create such a repetitive and confusing alphabet?
I think that the glyph system is relatively easy to understand if you consider that what is about is to reproduce celestial movements. Is that what explains that we see so many repeated words.
The hardest thing to understand is the underlying mentality, which I believe is related to the very old and persistent idea of sacred alphabets