Anton wrote:No references to exact folios or places in the text is given.
That's been the problem from the beginning. She gives nothing that allows others see whether her claims are valid, and nothing that reveals her method. She's been making it a 'big secret' all along.
Her article on Researchgate is a vague article with a bit of incomplete here-and-there info on cryptography history and some bad interpretations of medieval script. It does not express anything new, or correct, or useful in moving the research forward.
It's also ridiculous that the Researchgate article footnotes are mostly Gerard Cheshire and herself, and yet her self references are to writings that say nothing. She hasn't published anything in the past except vague abstracts.
It's possible the VMS has connections to Galicia, but not for the reasons given by Gladyseva. Her month-name readings are projections of her theory rather than actual readings of what is written.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)