21-09-2020, 09:49 PM
In her early press releases she was writing she had translated the VMS and that she had a c. 500-page manuscript describing the text and drawings.
Now she is writing that she is leaning toward Torsten Timm's autocopying idea.
Those are conflicting statements.
The blogpost doesn't tell us very much but she has some odd ideas about f116v. If she has changed her ideas about the VMS text being readable (saying that it might be fabricated text) then what was all that advanced publicity about her having translated it?
Unfortunately, I only know a tiny bit of Russian, mostly written Russian, and I can't understand more than a few words when she speaks so fast.
Did she happen to mention which drawing she thinks is lavender? And what does she mean by the last image, does she mean a big plant-drawing or a small one?
Now she is writing that she is leaning toward Torsten Timm's autocopying idea.
Those are conflicting statements.
The blogpost doesn't tell us very much but she has some odd ideas about f116v. If she has changed her ideas about the VMS text being readable (saying that it might be fabricated text) then what was all that advanced publicity about her having translated it?
Unfortunately, I only know a tiny bit of Russian, mostly written Russian, and I can't understand more than a few words when she speaks so fast.
Did she happen to mention which drawing she thinks is lavender? And what does she mean by the last image, does she mean a big plant-drawing or a small one?