(30-05-2020, 07:36 AM)Antonio García Jiménez wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Assumptions, assumptions again, once again. Koen G, the resemblance is very relevant, the most relevant. It is not something that comes out of our head, it is a fact of reality. And science is about interpreting reality.
Findings like this are a torpedo against the interpretation of the VM as a language and many people are reluctant to abandon their assumptions. The VM is a codex of astrological magic and the resemblance of this talismanic character is a proof of it
You don't seem to have understood anything that I have written about these talismanic characters.
1) The script you linked in the Arabic manuscript is a talismanic alphabet. It does not say anything against the interpretation of the VMS as a language.
2) Also, just because someone borrows a shape (or invents a shape) does not mean they are using it for the same purpose, which means that it is not sufficient evidence FOR or AGAINST the interpretation of the VMS glyphs. It is only a piece of the puzzle. You are trying to use one piece to describe the whole puzzle, one that is missing many pieces, too many to know whether the resemblance is direct or if it is coincidence.

