27-05-2020, 05:05 PM
It is your opinion JKP, not a fact at all. It's an opinion as respectable as all, but that I do not share. And I'm not going to speculate on what Baresch said to fit what I think. He said "Unknown characters", and nothing more.
The VM is entirely a European product and its authors naturally knew and wrote in Latin. Some small features can be glimpsed in the script but nothing more.
For me Eva-i, Eva-l and Eva-d are numbers, and Eva-o is no the letter o, it is the symbol for the sphere degree. And Eva-a and Eva-y are the same degree representing stars, some below the ecliptic line and others above.
It is my opinion, but I do not intend to impose it as a fact. I simply hope to convince the members of the forum and, like you, try to show documents that empirically support what I think. I have shown a page from an Arabic manuscript with the symbols Eva-t and Eva-k together and repeated several times on the same page as in the VM
It's the first time that I see it. Has anyone ever seen this? That is the question. Everything else is literature.
The VM is entirely a European product and its authors naturally knew and wrote in Latin. Some small features can be glimpsed in the script but nothing more.
For me Eva-i, Eva-l and Eva-d are numbers, and Eva-o is no the letter o, it is the symbol for the sphere degree. And Eva-a and Eva-y are the same degree representing stars, some below the ecliptic line and others above.
It is my opinion, but I do not intend to impose it as a fact. I simply hope to convince the members of the forum and, like you, try to show documents that empirically support what I think. I have shown a page from an Arabic manuscript with the symbols Eva-t and Eva-k together and repeated several times on the same page as in the VM
It's the first time that I see it. Has anyone ever seen this? That is the question. Everything else is literature.