14-04-2020, 01:18 PM
Antonio, I don't know how to decode it either, but we have 6 pages of threads where you are repeating the same thing, that it's symbolic rather than linguistic.
You don't have to convince us of that. There are quite a few people who are open to the possibility that the VMS is symbolic (including me), and have been for some time.
What you need to convince us is that it's specifically astronomical or numerical, because you are being more specific about what the content includes than just saying it's symbolic.
I think you were on the right track when you pulled out some examples from manuscripts of the kinds of data the VMS might represent. Now if you could MATCH UP some of that data with some parts of the VMS, even a few tokens, then maybe you can demonstrate how it might work in Voynichese.
You don't have to convince us of that. There are quite a few people who are open to the possibility that the VMS is symbolic (including me), and have been for some time.
What you need to convince us is that it's specifically astronomical or numerical, because you are being more specific about what the content includes than just saying it's symbolic.
I think you were on the right track when you pulled out some examples from manuscripts of the kinds of data the VMS might represent. Now if you could MATCH UP some of that data with some parts of the VMS, even a few tokens, then maybe you can demonstrate how it might work in Voynichese.