27-02-2020, 09:57 PM
(27-02-2020, 06:06 PM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(27-02-2020, 05:47 PM)Anton wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(21-02-2020, 10:04 PM)davidjackson wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.suggest that the manscript’s contents shift significantly at some point around Folios 30 to 40.
That's where the Currier B begins to appear. Did they spot on that?
That's what I was thinking too. I haven't read the papers (and can't find time to do it right now) but were they aware of Curriers A and B when they wrote it?
Yes, the author makes reference to the Currier languages, at least in the other blog posts of which the paper that david linked is one in a series. He did not belabor the point of connection with Currier's analysis. I got the sense that he did not perform the statistical analyses he did with Currier ever in mind, or with the primary objective of corroborating Currier's findings, even if that's what he ended up doing.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)