03-08-2019, 01:56 PM
Antonio, confining your study of the Radix symbol to only astronomy books is not good research.
I find things every day. Every day. Interesting things. Potentially important things.
But what you have to do is LOOK AROUND to see if it really IS important or if it's commonplace. That's the real work, and that takes time (time people don't want to devote, which is why there is so much bad research).
Finding Radix in astronomy books, okay, might mean something, might not. How do you know?
You must look at OTHER KINDS OF MANUSCRIPTS to see if it is specific to astronomy books, or common to every kind of manuscript.
You have NO IDEA if you are looking at an elephant's tail or at an elephant's trunk if you are 1/2 a centimeter away and you fail to step back and examine the big picture.
No one will take you seriously if you examine only what you WANT to see.
I find things every day. Every day. Interesting things. Potentially important things.
But what you have to do is LOOK AROUND to see if it really IS important or if it's commonplace. That's the real work, and that takes time (time people don't want to devote, which is why there is so much bad research).
Finding Radix in astronomy books, okay, might mean something, might not. How do you know?
You must look at OTHER KINDS OF MANUSCRIPTS to see if it is specific to astronomy books, or common to every kind of manuscript.
You have NO IDEA if you are looking at an elephant's tail or at an elephant's trunk if you are 1/2 a centimeter away and you fail to step back and examine the big picture.
No one will take you seriously if you examine only what you WANT to see.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)