29-07-2019, 04:14 PM
I forgot to say something about this link You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
If you look at the first two columns, down in red you can see twice, in the same sentence, the right leg of Eva-k
The phrase says in Latin: radices medii motus capitis (roots of the middle movement of the head). It is caput draconis.
You can see Eva-k as abbreviation in radices and capitis. Does it do the same function in both? I don't think so.
The glyph is the same for radix and radices, which suggests that it does not have a grammatical function.
In capitis, as in veneris in the second column, also down in red, the glyph does have the grammatical function of the Latin genitive. It is an linguistic abbreviation.
All this makes me suspect that in radix or radices the glyph works as an iconic meridian symbol
If you look at the first two columns, down in red you can see twice, in the same sentence, the right leg of Eva-k
The phrase says in Latin: radices medii motus capitis (roots of the middle movement of the head). It is caput draconis.
You can see Eva-k as abbreviation in radices and capitis. Does it do the same function in both? I don't think so.
The glyph is the same for radix and radices, which suggests that it does not have a grammatical function.
In capitis, as in veneris in the second column, also down in red, the glyph does have the grammatical function of the Latin genitive. It is an linguistic abbreviation.
All this makes me suspect that in radix or radices the glyph works as an iconic meridian symbol