13-07-2019, 08:49 AM
As JKP says I have no evidence, but in this thread I have provided some clues and I will show another one:
This is the 'Tratado de Astrologia de Enrique de Villena' You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
There are several astronomical circles but there is a difference between them. Only those that represent the ecliptic with the names of the zodiacal signs have three lines or stripes. Therefore it can be ruled out that these lines are decorative.They would be in all circles if they were.
These lines mark the beginning degree of each zodiacal sign and the previous and subsequent degree. It is an abbreviated way to indicate that the circumference is divided into 360 degrees.
We've all seen those three lines or stripes in the VM imagery. In the astronomical clock of the Rosettes pages and in other illustrations. I think the lines are also in the script. They are the i sequence: i ii iii. They are not letters. The fact that they are leaned indicates that they are inscribed in the sphere.
This is the 'Tratado de Astrologia de Enrique de Villena' You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
There are several astronomical circles but there is a difference between them. Only those that represent the ecliptic with the names of the zodiacal signs have three lines or stripes. Therefore it can be ruled out that these lines are decorative.They would be in all circles if they were.
These lines mark the beginning degree of each zodiacal sign and the previous and subsequent degree. It is an abbreviated way to indicate that the circumference is divided into 360 degrees.
We've all seen those three lines or stripes in the VM imagery. In the astronomical clock of the Rosettes pages and in other illustrations. I think the lines are also in the script. They are the i sequence: i ii iii. They are not letters. The fact that they are leaned indicates that they are inscribed in the sphere.