No text, but a visual code

[Antonio García Jiménez]

As we have seen with the 'last solution' of the VMS, there is always the same assumption: the script is a verbal language, a string of sounds. Why? Why can not it be a visual communication system?
  There are many indications that the script is not made up of phonemes or letters but of symbols. The phonemes have no meaning for themselves, the symbols do. Each glyph of VMS script is a symbol that refers to a reality, something we can see mentally.
  Here are some clues:
  --Single glyphs sequences in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and columns of symbols in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and f66r. They are the same glyphs that form strings.
  ---spaces as 'word separators'. Many times the space is confusing and there are not punctuation marks
  --- Gallows as first glyph in paragraphs and gallows extended
  ---- Line as a functional unit (LAAFU)
-----There are no phrases. The glyphs inside a string are ordered but the groups are no repeated. That's the way a language does not work, but the chains of symbols can do it because they depend more on the will of the author or on a system that we don't know.