No text, but a visual code

[Linda]

I understand your skepticism Nablator. The word progression is not the correct one. What I wanted to express is the sensation of movement that we see in the VMS script. The glyphs are in movement and this is something that is well appreciated in the autocopyng system of Torsten or how the glyphs © and (i) behave.
   © and (i), as some researchers have pointed -like Brian Cham- govern the structure of 'words'. I think these glyphs and its repetitions mark the routes of the Moon and the Sun in the sky and serve as coordinates to identify the stars.
 I sincerely believe it's the simplest theory and, according to the Ockham's razor, the most likely.
If you think the VMS is a genuine document with a message you have to give it a sense, but not any meaning but one that is consistent with what people believed 600 years ago.

But how would it work exactly? You say it is simple but i have yet to see you outline a single coordinate, or show how these glyphs would mark the routes of the sun and moon to serve as coordinates to identify stars. When i mentioned that you would likely need a specific location on earth to view these from, you negated this idea. I am not saying you are wrong i just dont understand how you think it works.