22-04-2019, 05:31 PM
It is true that in the labels you can identify a star with only one or two 'words' but in the running text, in the plant folios or in another section, it seems you need more. It's as if the text is in motion. You don't find the glyph (q) in labels and this symbol with its arrow shape express very well the movement.
Maybe in the running text the celestial sphere moves as if the days passed to better identify the star associated with the plant. Maybe it's for another reason.
Anyway, something tells me that our way of reasoning is not the same as that of the people to whom the manuscript was addressed.
Maybe in the running text the celestial sphere moves as if the days passed to better identify the star associated with the plant. Maybe it's for another reason.
Anyway, something tells me that our way of reasoning is not the same as that of the people to whom the manuscript was addressed.