24-03-2019, 07:30 PM
Of course everything depends of the interpretation and everyone sees different things. But we have to try not to get carried away by the imagination.
I return to the so-called text. If I see with my eyes in the outercircle of the f70r1 nine (o) in a row: ooooooooo followed by other glyphs, how am I to believe that this string is part of a language or a cipher. It is an astronomical diagram. The logical thing is to think that the scribe is drawing some degrees of the sphere, little circles that we also see in the center of stars.
The string of (o) is preceded by dots as if the scribe had wanted to simplify the work of drawing so many (o). The same dots I see them in the so-called text in some extended gallows.
This is what I see. I don't see alphabet letters anywhere.
I return to the so-called text. If I see with my eyes in the outercircle of the f70r1 nine (o) in a row: ooooooooo followed by other glyphs, how am I to believe that this string is part of a language or a cipher. It is an astronomical diagram. The logical thing is to think that the scribe is drawing some degrees of the sphere, little circles that we also see in the center of stars.
The string of (o) is preceded by dots as if the scribe had wanted to simplify the work of drawing so many (o). The same dots I see them in the so-called text in some extended gallows.
This is what I see. I don't see alphabet letters anywhere.

