07-10-2018, 07:38 PM
Diane, please try to stay on topic.
You can't barge in almost two years after an original post simply to recriminate a poster upon an obscure and irrelevant point of crediting an idea. Also, if you look at the post I You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.you're talking about (you fail yet again to be specific), Marco did not arbitrarily credit the idea to someone; he clearly said "I first read about this idea here", providing a link. Which to me seems to be more than clear and professional. As opposed to your barbs about "distorts and degrades the standard of scholarly discourse".
This obsession with clear references must stop. You tend to take it to extremes, demanding peer-reviewed levels of footnotes which simply aren't necessary in general conversation. Thank you.
You can't barge in almost two years after an original post simply to recriminate a poster upon an obscure and irrelevant point of crediting an idea. Also, if you look at the post I You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.you're talking about (you fail yet again to be specific), Marco did not arbitrarily credit the idea to someone; he clearly said "I first read about this idea here", providing a link. Which to me seems to be more than clear and professional. As opposed to your barbs about "distorts and degrades the standard of scholarly discourse".
This obsession with clear references must stop. You tend to take it to extremes, demanding peer-reviewed levels of footnotes which simply aren't necessary in general conversation. Thank you.
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)