-JKP- > 17-09-2017, 09:18 PM
Koen G > 17-09-2017, 09:30 PM
Anton > 17-09-2017, 09:43 PM
davidjackson > 17-09-2017, 09:47 PM
Quote:I would like to restrict this poll to substitution codes that do not involve transpositions (in other words, this poll is not asking about solutions that involve changing relofw into flower).But if you don't give those who think this is the answer an opportunity to vote, you're skewing the result.
Koen G > 17-09-2017, 09:49 PM
-JKP- > 17-09-2017, 09:54 PM
(17-09-2017, 09:47 PM)davidjackson Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I don't think the questions make sense. If we agree it's a one-to-one code, then it's not a natural language; and so the fourth answer makes no sense.
And the third option doesn't gell with your explanation - it should read more like "underlying natural language with anagram code obfuscation" or something. It's fine saying
Quote:I would like to restrict this poll to substitution codes that do not involve transpositions (in other words, this poll is not asking about solutions that involve changing relofw into flower).But if you don't give those who think this is the answer an opportunity to vote, you're skewing the result.
Emma May Smith > 17-09-2017, 10:24 PM
-JKP- > 17-09-2017, 10:33 PM
(17-09-2017, 10:24 PM)Emma May Smith Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(17-09-2017, 09:49 PM)Koen Gh. Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Would the third option mean a complex cipher for example?
Surely the third option means that it's a natural language written in the plain without any kind of cipher?
Davidsch > 18-09-2017, 10:50 AM
Koen G > 18-09-2017, 01:42 PM