30-06-2018, 11:28 PM
Thank you Emma for joining in the debate. I agree with you that the Voynich is a normal language written plainly and not a criptological text, although I think is a visual language, no phonetic; an astronomical code with rules like the position of the gallows at the beginning of paragraphs and at the top of lines. I think they mark the coordinates at the Midheaven of the Ecliptic to place the stars and the Moon as the celestial sphere moves.
It's true thant the Voynich is not a technical book of astronomy. These books are full of charts with numbers and numbers to place stars and planets on the Ecliptic. It is by wich I believe that the script of the Voynich is a variant of it and as boring as these books. In the imagery of the Voynich is where I've seen the more original interpretation of Aristotle's cosmology: the stars personified like women coming down to the Earth trough pipes and tubes because they have to come across the solid crystal spheres to reach their destination.
At the time of the Voynich people knew the proper names of many stars. Although original, the Voynich is only a product of its time. We are the problem for our incapacity to understand the world as it was seen in the XV century.
It's true thant the Voynich is not a technical book of astronomy. These books are full of charts with numbers and numbers to place stars and planets on the Ecliptic. It is by wich I believe that the script of the Voynich is a variant of it and as boring as these books. In the imagery of the Voynich is where I've seen the more original interpretation of Aristotle's cosmology: the stars personified like women coming down to the Earth trough pipes and tubes because they have to come across the solid crystal spheres to reach their destination.
At the time of the Voynich people knew the proper names of many stars. Although original, the Voynich is only a product of its time. We are the problem for our incapacity to understand the world as it was seen in the XV century.

