-JKP- > 06-11-2016, 12:18 PM
stellar > 06-11-2016, 04:10 PM
(06-11-2016, 12:18 PM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.JKP,(05-11-2016, 12:07 PM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view....
Why did you use the P glyphs with the double loops in your count and remove the P with the single loop (the first one at the top of the column)?
Koen G > 06-11-2016, 06:37 PM
ThomasCoon > 06-11-2016, 07:25 PM
(06-11-2016, 04:10 PM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I agree to disagree with Thomas's assessment as I believe 71 was a fully intended vord at the beginning of that voynich sentence.
ThomasCoon > 07-11-2016, 03:59 PM
stellar > 07-11-2016, 10:58 PM
(07-11-2016, 03:59 PM)ThomasCoon Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Alright Stellar, I'm sorry for the long wait. Here are all 12 signs. Only one of the names is not German (Piscis - a valid and grammatical form of the word "Pisces" in Latin).Thomas,
What I'm trying to prove with this image:
It's not surprising that your numerology fits each Zodiac sign - it's actually normal and inevitable. Let's say that you can't fit the standard word for "Gemini" in German or Welsh: you can then try "twin" "twins" "twin-brothers", "brothers", "siblings", and so on. Eventually, something will equal the number that you already know you need. When you see that you need 1 or a 6 or a 9, you can just go through all the possible related words, singulars and plurals, and alternate spellings (John vs. Iuan vs. Ieuan) until you finally get a match. Does that make sense?
stellar > 08-11-2016, 12:09 AM
(06-11-2016, 07:50 AM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(05-11-2016, 10:41 PM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(05-11-2016, 10:26 PM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I counted the vords in each chunk and they do not match the number of vords you have listed on the right.
JKP,
How much are you off by and which folio are you referring too. Science uses a a 95% confidence and my count would be within that range.
Stellar, science says that if there are 50 words, then there are 50 words. You don't use 95% confidence level to excuse sloppiness. Confidence levels are used for counting things for which there is not an exact count. A short paragraph of less than 100 words with pretty clear spaces, in this instance, has an exact count. Too many of yours are off to excuse them.
I always have the impression you rush headlong through things without checking them. And then you excuse your own haste by bringing up confidence levels where they don't apply, instead of re-checking your counts.
Do yourself a favor. Set a higher standard. You will receive much more attention and consideration for your ideas if you double-check them. We all have limited time and I'm near the end of my patience. If my patience runs out I won't bother reading your posts any more. For the record, I am more patient (much more patient) than most people I know.
ThomasCoon > 08-11-2016, 01:27 AM
Witch Mountain > 08-11-2016, 01:28 AM
(07-11-2016, 03:59 PM)ThomasCoon Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It's not surprising that your numerology fits each Zodiac sign - it's actually normal and inevitable. Let's say that you can't fit the standard word for "Gemini" in German or Welsh: you can then try "twin" "twins" "twin-brothers", "brothers", "siblings", and so on. Eventually, something will equal the number that you already know you need. When you see that you need 1 or a 6 or a 9, you can just go through all the possible related words, singulars and plurals, and alternate spellings (John vs. Iuan vs. Ieuan) until you finally get a match. Does that make sense?