bi3mw > 01-07-2024, 04:31 PM
bi3mw > 01-07-2024, 07:48 PM
Ruby Novacna > 01-07-2024, 08:33 PM
Koen G > 01-07-2024, 08:56 PM
(01-07-2024, 08:33 PM)Ruby Novacna Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I like the identification of f1v's plant as an olive tree, except I've seen such a suggestion made years ago by Darren Worley.
ReneZ > 02-07-2024, 01:17 AM
Quote:Our primary source for Rudolf II's ownership comes from a 17th-century letter discovered by Wilfrid Voynich, the 20th-century antiquarian who purchased the manuscript (Clemens, 2016). This letter mentions a sale to Rudolf for 600 ducats, a significant sum suggesting the high value placed on the manuscript. However, the lack of corroborating evidence from the imperial court records raises questions about the letter's authenticity (Schmeidler, 2019).This isn't entirely logical. This should not question the letter's authenticity, but it may question its
Quote:Schmeidler, S. (2019). Book transactions of Emperor Rudolf II, 1576–1612: New findings on the earliest ownership of the Voynich manuscript. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3313, 201-212.
Bluetoes101 > 02-07-2024, 02:47 AM
Koen G > 02-07-2024, 07:43 AM
Aga Tentakulus > 02-07-2024, 10:19 AM
Ruby Novacna > 02-07-2024, 01:43 PM
(02-07-2024, 10:19 AM)Aga Tentakulus Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The flowers also look completely different.Without wanting to defend the choice of the olive tree, I would like to point out that we should not compare the image of a plant with its real appearance, but rather with the presentations of this plant in other manuscripts.