(27-08-2026, 09:02 AM)Aga Tentakulus wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(27-08-2026, 08:13 AM)JoJo_Jost wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.so: In my Latin biblical corpus they occur in 1.10% of all word tokens combined.
What do you mean by that?
Are you talking about a passage from the Bible?
No, that was just a part of it: 7,343 verses, ~127,600 words.
I took now the entire Bible (printed in 1454) 35.811 Verse, 612.005 Words
-atis 1,530 0.2500%
-itis 1,360 0.2222%
-ati 1,208 0.1974%
-etis 877 0.1433%
-iti 315 0.0515%
-uti 234 0.0382%
-utis 164 0.0268%
-otis 85 0.0139%
-eti 73 0.0119%
-oti 66 0.0108%
Total 5,912 0.9660%
Nothing changes.
And 334.471 words, mostly Thomas Aquinas (as a “learnblock”), i.e., 13th-century medieval Latin.
Those are the two corpora I have readily available at the moment.
A total of nearly 1 million words
What kind of Latin are you looking for?
But as I said, it would be easier if you gave me an example where the frequency of the glyph sequence you mentioned reaches 10 percent—or even just three...
Because no matter what I give you, you won’t accept it.
So I could give you 1,000 counterexamples, and even then it wouldn’t be conclusive for you.
In short: You should just provide me with a text where your assumption holds true, because so far it doesn’t look good for your “aiin.”

