25-01-2016, 08:26 AM
Relatively two languages “A” and “B” can not exclude following the development of events.
Author “A” in the process died without having completed the manuscript. Contours of figures have already been drawn. It remains only to write the text. Author (s) "B" knew very little language (did not know the language at all). "B" began using commonly used words from the language of "A" generate (invent) a word. The whole language “B“- a fake.
I can not understand how to apply the the words of the herbal section name in the stars. In my opinion, what is called the stars, the stars are not. It looks like a child's drawing of a flower with petals. The same applies to the last section, when the flower with the colored (red) the middle divides recipes into groups. (Anton wrote about it)
Author “A” in the process died without having completed the manuscript. Contours of figures have already been drawn. It remains only to write the text. Author (s) "B" knew very little language (did not know the language at all). "B" began using commonly used words from the language of "A" generate (invent) a word. The whole language “B“- a fake.
I can not understand how to apply the the words of the herbal section name in the stars. In my opinion, what is called the stars, the stars are not. It looks like a child's drawing of a flower with petals. The same applies to the last section, when the flower with the colored (red) the middle divides recipes into groups. (Anton wrote about it)