Elephant in the Room Solution Considerations

[MHTamdgidi_(Behrooz)]

For example, if you made a thread to discuss whether the Pleiades-Botrus substitution stands up to scrutiny, you can discuss the specific details of that aspect there, and then state in the thread that what is being debated is part of your overall theory (with a link to this thread). In that sense, the theory isn't "split", but its more that the full elephant remains here, but the trunk, legs, ears and tail become visible elsewhere. If people find those parts of the elephant, they may be directed here to discuss to whole. 

If you don't want to do that, that is completely fine. It's just my opinion on how best to promote the theory and my reasoning for why some of the issues you face occur. We can agree to disagree on that. 

Anyway, I don't mean to derail your thread. I just wanted to be supportive.

Thanks for your further notes and understanding.

I do see your point about the value of having a separate subject focus thread. My concern is about its practicality for me, and others. Creating a separate thread means others will reply there as well, then I (and others) must respond in both (and more threads), further segmenting my thread involvements, and this is just not practical for me given how much time I have to devote to this forum.

My alternative solution is, for those interested, is to use the google search box as in site: voynich.ninja.com “search term” option. 

If you go to google search and type in (without the quote marks) that string, it will list you all the posts that the term in a more either/or way, for example you can search if “Botrus” has been discussed in this forum. If you want the search term to be something very specific, exactly as, then use quote marks. I am sure you know about this, but for others not knowing it, do this:

In google search box type the following (“search term” being whatever it is you are searching for).

site: voynich.ninja.com search term

or, for more exact search

site: site: voynich.ninja.com “search term”

The above is a much more effective and inclusive way of addressing the point you are making.

Now, I see the post by pjburkshire, and it is a good point.