Elephant in the Room Solution Considerations

[Typpi]

I hope I have addressed the general spirit of what you kindly shared, and in the interest of not making this longer, I stop here.

Writing long posts and being overly verbose is a good thing if you actually have information to share. The problem is (and I mean this nicely as possible) there is very little substance in the posts. You could shorten this entire post to just:

---
I think my long posts are necessary because the Voynich Manuscript can’t be understood by splitting everything into separate topics. People focusing on my writing style instead of the content are missing the point, and sometimes it feels like an indirect personal attack.

I want people to engage with the ideas, not judge the length. Silence isn’t useful feedback, and calling my posts “verbose” doesn’t help anyone. Real research requires patience, empathy, and willingness to question our own assumptions.

I’m open to reasonable critique, but dismissing my work because it’s long is unfair and counterproductive. That’s the main issue I’m trying to address.
---

Secondly, you have to understand by the way you're going about this makes it extremely hard to follow. People have explained this over and over to you and you refuse to compromise while at the same time complaining about the "silence" 

If you want more engagement you NEED to change your writing style.