Elephant in the Room Solution Considerations

[MHTamdgidi_(Behrooz)]

If you think people not engaging with my proposals means automatically my views did not have substantive value, that is just your opinion. There can be many reasons for not engaging with others, and as a sociologist of knowledge I am aware of that and it is not an equation of first degree.

It is true that some posts generate more interest for reasons other than the significance and persuasiveness of the content, so the relationship is not linear. However, if both the arguments were persuasive and the ideas significant, I would expect some positive reaction. There are hundreds of people reading this forum. 

Personally, as I already said, I find the ideas not impossible and I'd say extremely important if only there were strong arguments supporting them.

@oshfdk

I appreciate your reading my posts and offering your views. I greatly admire those like you who are not convinced easily AND express them in more or less detail so that we can have a conversation about it, since in silence nobody can even judge if judgments made are reasonable or not.

I am exactly like you in this and perhaps even more so than you may imagine. So, when you see me offering a plausible proposal, you should rest assured it is not an impulsive proposal, but a result of lots of back and forth in my mind about it.

My thread has been a process, rather than a final-result reporting act. I have actually learned a lot of new things since starting the thread, myself or from others. I have not shared many things I even had learned before starting the thread since I want to be more sure about them, and I have learned new things since, which I have not also shared, since I am still trying to fully convince myself in the exactly the same spirit as yours.

When I say I have become even more convinced, it is not a statement made loosely. I mean it and if I follow up with my procedure without distractive comments about the length or size or organization of how I say things, perhaps you will also see more light at the end of the tunnel.

Your feedback and that of @eggyk (not entirely, but partly, in his case) has made me a bit more hopeful that at least a few are willing to consider the substance of what I am sharing here. So, I may continue, depending on whether more distractions occur. I am not here to waste anybody’s (and my) time, for sure.

So, please note that I am not expecting you to agree or not, yet, since I have not even shared many things I had planned to share, previously learned, or being newly found. But I do appreciate your sentiments, since I can see they are genuine and based on careful reading of my posts. 

This is just an open-ended process of learning for me as well. But, I can confidently say that so far, my previous and new findings are reinforcing my hypothesis about the authorship of the manuscript.