Elephant in the Room Solution Considerations

[oshfdk]

To me the situation here is similar to what happened previously with the "botrus" claim. It is of course possible that the word in the manuscript does read "botrus", it's just the argumentation for it doesn't look strong enough to me. Same with Countess Margaret of Tyrol, I can't say it's impossible that the manuscript is a later copy of her works, but I really see no definitive arguments for it so far. There is some similarity between certain Voynich MS images and certain images associated with Countess Margaret of Tyrol, this is an interesting observation worth investigating, however to me this doesn't look like conclusive proof of her authorship or involvement with the manuscript.