29-01-2026, 04:42 PM
Thanks oshfdk and Aga Tentakulus for letting me know about your trial came from.
Ruby Novacna, thanks for your feedback. I have not used Google lens (I checked in photoshop for any such lines before but did not see any). If it is not too much of a trouble, if you copy an image for what you see that will help and finalize this inquiry. I agree that (as I had said before) the person who claimed it not following it up is odd. Perhaps he will explain more. There can be many reasons for why he is not doing so.
It seems the online tools are not themselves reliable in confirming AI/fake images (as they themselves admit "Results can be inaccurate ...").
I still will not rule out the possibility that new digitizations of old manuscript may find other manuscripts written using the VM "letters"—which is why I think it is more scientific to rule out a fake by verifiable methods than just simply saying it looks like it is. That is the main lesson of this matter for me.
Ruby Novacna, thanks for your feedback. I have not used Google lens (I checked in photoshop for any such lines before but did not see any). If it is not too much of a trouble, if you copy an image for what you see that will help and finalize this inquiry. I agree that (as I had said before) the person who claimed it not following it up is odd. Perhaps he will explain more. There can be many reasons for why he is not doing so.
It seems the online tools are not themselves reliable in confirming AI/fake images (as they themselves admit "Results can be inaccurate ...").
I still will not rule out the possibility that new digitizations of old manuscript may find other manuscripts written using the VM "letters"—which is why I think it is more scientific to rule out a fake by verifiable methods than just simply saying it looks like it is. That is the main lesson of this matter for me.