22-01-2026, 07:33 AM
(This post was last modified: 22-01-2026, 07:36 AM by Doireannjane.)
I agree that purely visual interpretations of plants is dangerous and extremely reckless. I go over the medical components of the text itself in great deal and how comparison across plants is used in the text along with administration and all of my identifications are supported through textual analysis. Take for example my You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. of page composition in regards to water hemlock and cow parsnip(hogweed). I talk about how the scribe knew that it was necessary that these two be distinguished and defined in text and also visually on the pages directionally.
I advise others to not use AI, I don’t use and haven’t used any AI in any of my work. I also recommend documenting your work like I have. Working private is fine, but you will have to prove your work unfortunately the way the world is now. Why it’s important to be transparent and not have people play a guessing game. It’s also important to give credit where it is due.
I advise others to not use AI, I don’t use and haven’t used any AI in any of my work. I also recommend documenting your work like I have. Working private is fine, but you will have to prove your work unfortunately the way the world is now. Why it’s important to be transparent and not have people play a guessing game. It’s also important to give credit where it is due.

![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)