From my point of view, there is no such thing as agreement or concensus about the plant ID's, with very few exceptions (two or three it seems).
There are numerous lists by different people. Most of these are incomplete, and many of the people who made these lists have (had) no relevant background knowledge.
The source I put online is a collection of tentative ID's by Ethel Voynich (ELV) and by Th.Petersen, where the latter also seems to have drawn from O'Neal and Holm (both botanists). ELV also had consulted others but the record is not complete. More tentative ID's by ELV's were transcribed by Koen and Marco, and still more have not yet been transcribed.
Other lists can be found here: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Forum user @Aga Tentakulus has numerous identifications in a facebook account. A few have been posted in this forum.
I would be most interested if these could be put together somewhere, because they are well explained (in terms of what matches, what not, and why). But that is of course up to him.
There are numerous lists by different people. Most of these are incomplete, and many of the people who made these lists have (had) no relevant background knowledge.
The source I put online is a collection of tentative ID's by Ethel Voynich (ELV) and by Th.Petersen, where the latter also seems to have drawn from O'Neal and Holm (both botanists). ELV also had consulted others but the record is not complete. More tentative ID's by ELV's were transcribed by Koen and Marco, and still more have not yet been transcribed.
Other lists can be found here: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Forum user @Aga Tentakulus has numerous identifications in a facebook account. A few have been posted in this forum.
I would be most interested if these could be put together somewhere, because they are well explained (in terms of what matches, what not, and why). But that is of course up to him.