Elephant in the Room Solution Considerations

[MHTamdgidi_(Behrooz)]

Thanks Bluetoes101. You are of course entitled to your opinion. I disagree. In hermeneutics, what is absent but expected to be there can be very important interpretively. In particular cutting pages out after binding should raise at least some red flags, but entire quires?!

And then assume the manuscript when complete would be the same as when incomplete, as far as information given? It does not make good sense to me. 

How can anybody claim something was not originally in the manuscript when so many bifolia are missing or some literally cut out? It should not take forensic specialists to raise red flags about it. We are all are studying an INCOMPLETE Voynich manuscript. It should never be forgotten. 

I hope you will succeed in your way of going about it.