03-01-2026, 12:40 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-01-2026, 12:41 AM by Bluetoes101.)
Another issue would probably be, can we do this with any language?
If you take what I wrote above and assign meaning to groups of letters, we can have something about preparing herbs too.
Where ideas like this work, is if the vocabulary built up is backed by images, and then the expected terms pop up in further pages. For example if you thought a sound was for "Jesus" and another for "cross" and another for "on" then a page with Jesus on a cross drawn pops up and "Jesus on cross" is there. That's pretty convincing evidence you are on the right track, but your approach seems to need us to ignore images.. so what confirms anything?
"n" being final etc, doesn't mean anything (to add proof of correctness). I could say "n = fullstop" or ! or , or may things, nothing really makes "plural" more correct.
If you take what I wrote above and assign meaning to groups of letters, we can have something about preparing herbs too.
Where ideas like this work, is if the vocabulary built up is backed by images, and then the expected terms pop up in further pages. For example if you thought a sound was for "Jesus" and another for "cross" and another for "on" then a page with Jesus on a cross drawn pops up and "Jesus on cross" is there. That's pretty convincing evidence you are on the right track, but your approach seems to need us to ignore images.. so what confirms anything?
"n" being final etc, doesn't mean anything (to add proof of correctness). I could say "n = fullstop" or ! or , or may things, nothing really makes "plural" more correct.