Calgary engineer believes he's cracked the mysterious Voynich Manuscript

[Ahmet Ardıç]

Ahmet, 

Stop being intellectually dishonest. 
You know, we know, everyone knows. 

Its funny how in [every post you talk about Turkish language, and Turkish history of linguistics, and Turkish Sultans], but I don't recall you ever commenting on negative historical events to do with Turkey. Everyone else seems to get one. Strange. 

Here's one for your British history folder. 
The proverb “those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones” is often cited as originating in Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde written in 1385.

We probably stole it; but you get the point.

Bluetoes101

I assume Bluetoes101 is not your real name. Stop making inconsistent comments on topics you do not understand. At least, there is no need for these here. If you have knowledge about the history or the details of the VM, share it so that we can learn. If you don't have any knowledge, share your unnecessary comments under another topic.

There is no need to shout under the topic where I share my findings about the VM. There's no need for comments at the level of those who cried and shouted "Let's burn the witches, let's burn the witches" in medieval Europe. If you have any knowledge in the field of linguistics, speak up. If you have knowledge about Turkish history specifically related to the VM, you can write about that too. If you are studying the etymology of Indo-European and Turkic languages, you can also share your knowledge about certain words.

As I have written repeatedly, I prefer those who have knowledge in linguistics and history that is relevant to the VM's history to speak. But I do not appreciate those who speak just because they have a mouth.

The content of the VM is in Turkish. Even if you or others do not understand this, it won't change. So keep your low-level comments to yourself. The topic is already the Turkish language. The content of the VM is closely related to Turkish history before 1453 as well. Besides reading a manuscript, I am also showing that the information in the content overlaps with historical events. It is a manuscript written during the period of Sultan Mehmed the Conqueror, and the name "Mehmet" is written on the last page. That's why I got into this detail. I have also shared this detail for the first time. The content includes coded military information. You haven't understood the topic yet. I am explaining the details related to the content of the VM, and everything I have written is closely or remotely related to this.

You say; "every post you talk about Turkish language,  and Turkish history of linguistics, and Turkish Sultans".
> The subject is VM and it is the subject in Turkish since the VM is written in Turkish. That's why I am talking about Turkish. Does this inform you something?
> Now I am asking you to prove that I talked about Turkish Sultans' topic in every past post of mine.

For example, before today's post, I am giving you a chance to prove that I talked about this topic in every post. Now, tag my old posts and show everyone that I talked about this in every post, you to prove it to everyone. If you can't do this, it will turn out that you are a liar, which I cannot tolerate because, unfortunately, such platforms open to every type of person can have people who spout their opinions without understanding the topic.

I don't think your level of current knowledge evaluation skills will contribute to our VM-related work. So continue your comments under topics or fields at your level and do not make unnecessary noise here. If you have any words or criticism regarding the linguistic details of the VM or its history, just write that.

In our history, there is no disgrace to remind us that "people living in glass houses should not throw stones." We also say that "everyone tries to criticize others using the same methods as in the history they know." There are deceitful lies fraudulently attributed to our history, but none of them have been proven.

Also, since the word "dishonest" means "behaving or prone to behave in an untrustworthy or fraudulent way", I am not the one behaving this way. So I don't take this word to heart.

Here for months, I have only been asking questions about the content of the VM, and my posts are related to this. However, a few people in this group constantly twist what I write and create the perception that I wrote things that I did not. Some seem to tolerate this behavior. You should know that this behavior is not right. This is the behavior that deserves criticism.

We have proven and shown that the content of the VM is Turkish through various findings and overlaps. Are you talking about this or about your own history when you say "I know, everyone knows"? I don't think those who don't think the VM content is in Turkish have read my comments. If you don't think so, don't read. Look, there are other topics on this platform and maybe you should engage with them.

Now I expect you to prove that I talk about sultans and Turkish history in every post. If you prove it, I will apologize for everything I wrote here. If you do not prove it, you will deserve what I wrote here.

Please also share your information that proves that the content is not in Turkish or that the sources we show are not academic sources. If you have any knowledge and work on the VM, whether in history or linguistics, share it here. For example, share your articles so we can read them. But if you don't have these, then what are you doing on this page? Go mind your own business.